Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2134 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €290.43 vs €577.54
- Up to 39% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900F - €1.63 vs €2.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 1700 - 216 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
178
82%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
61%
Price, €
€577.54
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €577.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |