Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1155 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €53.0 vs €314.9
- Up to 83% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10900F - €0.34 vs €1.96 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 7 1700 - 161 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12263 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
17%
Price, €
€314.9
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €314.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12263 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |