Buy on Amazon
€53
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 548 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - €53.0 vs €68.52
- Up to 23% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-6100 - €0.1 vs €0.13 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 7 1700 - 532 vs 509 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Prozessor mit Wraith-Spire-LED-Kühler
Buy for €53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9443 minutes ago
Intel Core I3-6100 I3 6100 3,7 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 51 W CPU Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
