Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1830 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 6% better in Apex Legends than FX-6200 - 271 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - €42.6 vs €290.43
- Up to 84% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen 7 1700 - €0.17 vs €1.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |