Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 1747 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 33% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G4900 - 134 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - €60.24 vs €176.13
- Up to 54% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 5 7600 - €0.6 vs €1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €176.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
101
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |