Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G6900 - 189 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - €73.9 vs €106.09
- Up to 27% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 5600 - €0.41 vs €0.56 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €106.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
179
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 20th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |