Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600H is 2590 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- Performs up to 19% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1620 - 182 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
153
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Renoir | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |