Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2260 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 3% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than FX-6350 - 213 vs 207 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €85.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |