Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1052 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 1% better in League of Legends than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 150 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €133.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris Pro P6300 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |