Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 3079 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i7-860 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - €45.78 vs €124.22
- Up to 63% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 5 2400G - €0.23 vs €0.62 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
37%
Price, €
€124.22
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €124.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |