Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €45.78 vs €102.5
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10400 - €0.27 vs €0.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-860 - 188 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Buy for €102.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |