Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €59.96 vs €71.62
- Up to 5% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-10105F - €0.37 vs €0.39 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 12% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 5 1600X - 183 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
164
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
94%
Price, €
€71.62
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €71.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |