Buy on Amazon
€45
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1631 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8300 - 477 vs 450 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than FX-8300 - €45.0 vs €73.57
- Up to 44% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than FX-8300 - €0.09 vs €0.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
477
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 1600x Prozessor
Buy for €45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13095 minutes ago
Hegem AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz Achtkern-8M-Prozessorsockel AM3+ CPU 95 W Großpackung FX-8300
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13094 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Ryzen 5 1600X or FX-8300
DOOM Eternal, 1920 x 1080, Nightmare
19 FPS
€52.58/FPS
GeForce GT 710
FX-8300
8 GB, 500 GB HDD
Buy on Amazon
€999
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
