Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €79.97 vs €319.57
- Up to 68% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900KF - €0.25 vs €0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 1500X - 414 vs 323 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1500X - 20 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
323
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
414
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
32%
Price, €
€319.57
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €319.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |