Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 982 days newer than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 3% better in God of War than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 - 175 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 7th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Renoir |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
