Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2790 days newer than Core i3-3220.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Core i3-3220 - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
145
94.15584415584416%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €62.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3715 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
31.437125748502993%
Multi-Core
1085
18.729501122043846%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |