Buy on Amazon
€47.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $120
Availability
MSRP in USD: $120
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1697 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 10% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G3900 - 284 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
91.19718309859155%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €47.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1620 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
34.790419161676645%
Multi-Core
992
17.124115311582944%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
