Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500T outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6500T is 1649 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-6500T - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500T
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 180 vs 174 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i5-6500T
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-6500T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
