Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 2443 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 15 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 8% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 164 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 8 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
