Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 79 days older than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 3 3200U - 245 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 6 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
245
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€209
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €209 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |