Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1907 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - €209.0 vs €258.47
- Up to 12% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-14400F - €1.15 vs €1.31 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-9600K - 197 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 16 vs 6 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
182
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€209
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €209 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 335 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
87%
Price, €
€258.47
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €258.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |