Buy on Amazon
€68.4
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3101 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 10% better in Rust than Core i5-2500K - 179 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - €43.94 vs €68.4
- Up to 29% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 3 3200G - €0.27 vs €0.38 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4,2GHz AM4 6MB Cache Wraith Spire
Buy for €68.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
162
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.94
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2500K CPU Verwendeter 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,3 GHz 6M 95W LGA1155
Buy for €43.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Ryzen 3 3200G or Core i5-2500K
Rust, 1920 x 1080, High
9 FPS
€77.67/FPS
Radeon RX 6400
Ryzen 3 3200G
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€699
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
