Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1207 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - €176.43 vs €203.31
- Up to 13% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-7600K - €1.63 vs €1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3100 - 109 vs 108 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
108
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€176.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €176.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12162 minutes ago
Buy for €203.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |