Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2104 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 18% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-4160 - 374 vs 317 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
374
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€61.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €61.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3684 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
71.94050033806626%
Multi-Core
2072
40.779374138949024%
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |