Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €75.2 vs €280.21
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 2200G - 181 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €75.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Buy for €280.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
59.48687350835322%
Multi-Core
2858
33.918822691668645%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |