Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1550 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than FX-6350 - 177 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 6 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €34.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |