Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 1336 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Phenom II X4 830 - 127 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
126
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
FX | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Vishera | Codename | Deneb |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |