Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 5297 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Control than Phenom X4 9550 - 208 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 32 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €436.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
7.870837537840565%
Multi-Core
712
3.542112332719765%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |