Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 5297 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 60% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Phenom X4 9550 - 272 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 24 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€362.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €362.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17850 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |