Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 3381 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 9% better in New World than Phenom X4 9550 - 104 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 64 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | EPYC |
| Agena | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
