Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 4214 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - €27.62 vs €267.92
- Up to 78% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-11900 - €0.13 vs €0.58 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 116% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Phenom II X4 830 - 465 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
215
46%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
465
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
22%
Price, €
€267.92
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €267.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Deneb | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |