Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 4508 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €27.62 vs €271.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-12700F - €0.24 vs €1.81 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 33% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom II X4 830 - 150 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
113
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Buy for €271 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Deneb | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |