Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4774 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €27.62 vs €315.7
- Up to 90% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-13600K - €0.19 vs €1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Phenom II X4 830 - 167 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 20 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
147
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 301 minutes ago
Buy for €315.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |