Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €27.62 vs €124.55
- Up to 75% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-10600KF - €0.15 vs €0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than Phenom II X4 830 - 205 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
188
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
24%
Price, €
€124.55
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €124.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |