Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €27.62 vs €91.6
- Up to 64% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-10400F - €0.13 vs €0.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Lost Ark than Phenom II X4 830 - 258 vs 217 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 12 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
217
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |