Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6200 is 909 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 35% cheaper than FX-6200 - €27.62 vs €42.6
- Up to 33% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than FX-6200 - €0.26 vs €0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 3% better in HITMAN 2 than Phenom II X4 830 - 110 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 6 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
107
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18126 minutes ago
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
Deneb | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |