Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - €155.88 vs €290.43
- Up to 39% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 2700X - €1.71 vs €2.79 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8350 - 104 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12311 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
104
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.79/FPS
61%
Price, €
€290.43
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |