Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1938 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 4% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-8350 - 113 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than FX-8350 - €74.85 vs €155.88
- Up to 54% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-8350 - €0.66 vs €1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15418 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |