Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 2358 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 15 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |