Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 685 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8320 - 177 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |