Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 377 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than FX-8150 - 111 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |