Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2961 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-8150 - 113 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-8150 CPU verwendet 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,6 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 15737 minutes ago
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Athlon |
| Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
