Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 276 days older than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8150 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-8150 CPU verwendet 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,6 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 13588 minutes ago
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Sockel 1155 Core-i5 Prozessor (2500MHz, L2/L3-Cache)
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13588 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
