Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8150 is 327 days older than Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
