Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8120 is 38 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Celeron G530 - 153 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
150
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |