Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 2008 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8120 - 287 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |