Buy on Amazon
€137.04
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3443 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than FX-8120 - 204 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i5-11400 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 2.6GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 6 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811400
Buy for €137.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75054 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-11400
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using FX-8120 or Core i5-11400
Control, 1920 x 1080, High
49 FPS
€24.47/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Core i5-11400
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€1,199
In Stock
58 FPS
€24.14/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i5-11400
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€1,399.9
In Stock
94 FPS
€14.88/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Core i5-11400
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€1,399
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
