Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8120 is 771 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Phenom II X4 830 - 66 vs 61 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
61
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
FX | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Zambezi | Codename | Deneb |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |