Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 34 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6350 - 129 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
