Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 603 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G530 - 108 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
106
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |